Thailand Law Forum Thailand Law Forum
HOME | THAILAND LAWYER BLOG |LAW NEWS | LAW JOURNAL | COURT OPINIONS |LAW DATABASE |ABOUT |THAILAND LAWYERS

 

WTO RULING TO STRENGTHEN WORLD’S EXPORT ON SUGAR:

THAILAND AS A CASE STUDY

KANAPHON CHANHOM*

         BIBLIOGRAPHY

         Books & Articles

  • Apichart Pongsrihadulchai. “Application of Information Technology in Agriculture in Thailand,” in Agricultural Information Technology in Asia and Oceania. (19: 1998).
  • Appellate Body Report. European Communities – Export Subsidies on Sugar. WT/DS265/R, WT/DS266/R, and WT/DS283/AB/R, Apr. 28, 2005.
  • Article 2.3(c) Arbitration Report. European Communities – Export Subsidies on Sugar. WT/DS283/14, Oct. 28, 2005.
  • Benitah, March. The Law of Subsidies under the GATT/WTO System. New York: Kluwer Law International, 2001.
  • Chaweewan Klaiya. Analysis of Changes in the World Structure of Sugar Market and Effects on Thai Sugar Exports. Bangkok: Thammasart University, 2004.
  • Council Regulation 318/2006. 2006 J.O. (L 58).
  • Davey, William J. “The Rules for Agricultural Trade in GATT,” in GATT and Trade Liberalization in Agriculture. Masayoshi Honma, Akiko Shimizu & Hideki Funatu eds., 1993.
  • Department of Trade Negotiations. Suing against the EC before the WTO in Export Subsidies on Sugar. Unpublished fact sheet, on file with Department of Trade Negotiations, Ministry of Commerce, Thailand, 2005.
  • Dixon, Craig A. A. “Environmental Survey of WTO Dispute Resolution Panel Decisions since 1995: Trade at all Costs?,” Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol’y Rev., (24: 2000).
  • Figueroa, Miguel Antonio. “The GATT and Agriculture: Past, Present, and Future,” Kan. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y, (5: 1995-1996).
  • Filipek, Jon G. “Agriculture in a World of Comparative Advantage: The Prospects for Farm Trade Liberalization in the Uruguay Round of GATT Negotiations” Harv. Int’l L. J., (30: 1989).
  • Gudoshnicov, Sergey. “Prospects in Major Exporters and Importers,” in The World Sugar Market. Sergey Gudoshnicov, Linda Jolly & Donald Spence eds., 2004.
  • Hathaway, Dale E. Agriculture and the GATT: Rewriting the Rules. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1987.
  • Hoekman, Bernard & Messerlin, Patrick. “Removing the Exception of Agricultural Export Subsidies,” in Agricultural Trade Reform & the Doha Development Agenda. Kym Anderson & Will Martin eds., 2006.
  • Hudec, Robert E. “Does the Agreement on Agriculture Work? Agricultural Dispute after the Uruguay Round,” Int’l Agric. Trade Research Consortium, Working paper No. 98-2, 1998.
  • Jackson, John H. The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • . World Trade and the Law of GATT: A Legal Analysis on the General Tariffs and Trade. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.
  • and Trade. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969.
    Kennedy, Kevin C. “International Trade in Agriculture: Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where’re Headed,” MSU-DCL J. Int’l L., (10: 2001).
  • Kermel-Torrès, Doryane. Atlas of Thailand: Spatial Structures and Development. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 2004.
  • Males, Warren. “Building Alliances for Liberalization and Reform of Sugar Policies Globally,” in Sugar and Related Sweetener Markets: International Perspectives. Andrew Schmitz et al. eds., 2002.
  • Mitchell, Donald O. “Sugar Policies: An Opportunity for Change,” in Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries. M. Ataman Aksoy & John C. Beghin eds., 2005.
  • Montana-Mora, Miguel. “International Law and International Relations Cheek to Cheek: An International Law/International Relation Perspective on the U.S./EC Agricultural Export Subsidies Dispute,” N.C. J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg., (19: 1993-1994).
  • Office of Cane and Sugar Board. Quantity and Value of Exported Sugar 1997-2005. Unpublished fact sheet, on file with Office of Cane and Sugar Board, Thailand, 2005.
  • fact sheet, on file with Office of Cane and Sugar Board, Thailand, 2005.
    Panel Report. European Communities – Export Subsidies on Sugar. WT/DS265/R, WT/DS266/R, and WT/DS283/R, Oct. 15, 2004.
  • Report of the Panel. EC – Refunds on Exports of Sugar, L/4833 (1979), GATT B.I.S.D. (26th Supp.) (1980).
  • . EC – Refunds on Exports of Sugar, L/5011 (1980), GATT B.I.S.D. (27th Supp.) (1981).
  • Södersten, Bo & Reed, Geoffrey. International Economics. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994.
    Stoll, Peter-Tobias & Schorkopf, Frank. WTO: World Economic Order, World Economic Law. Leiden: Nijhoff, 2006.
  • Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. Thai Economy. Nontaburi: University Press, 2001.
  • Tangermann, Stefan. “Agriculture on the Way to Firm International Trading Rules,” in The Political Economy of International trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec. Daniel L.M. Kennedy & James D. Southwick eds., 2002.
  • WTO. International Trade Statistics. Geneva: WTO, 2005.
  • . WTO Agreements Series: Agriculture. Geneva: WTO, 2000.
 
Index     Footnote

Chaninat & Leeds, a Thailand attorney firm has provided support in acquiring materials for the Thailand Law Forum. Bangkok lawyers at Chaninat & Leeds have also assisted with translation of Thai language materials.For any submissions, comments, or questions, e-mail the Thailand Law Forum at: info@thailawforum.com Please read our Disclaimer.

© Copyright Thailand Law Forum, All Rights Reserved
(except where the work is the individual works of the authors as noted)