Thailand Law Forum Thailand Law Forum  
 
Feature Articles :

Neither Free nor Fair -
  Burma’s Sham Elections



US Immigration and
  Thai Sex Workers



Legal Rights of
  Transgenders and their
  Partners in Thailand



Renewable Energy
  in Thailand



The Erawan Shrine   Curse and the Red Shirt   Demonstrations



Marriage and Divorce
  in Thailand



Foreign Corrupt
  Practices Act and the
  Thailand Film Festival
Foreign Mafia in
  Thailand
Sex Laws in Thailand:
  Part 1

Thailand News :
16 November 10
   Provisional Ruling Gives
   Cigarette Tax Case
   to the Philippines
15 November 10
   Free Trade Pact
   Discussed by US and
   Eight Pacific Nations
   at APEC Forum
15 November 10
   Stock Exchange of
   Thailand Aims to Lift
   Profile with “Asean Stars”
15 November 10
   US Judge Dismisses
   Several Counts Against
   Men Accused of Plot
   to Overthrow Laos
15 November 10
   Asset-Bubble Fears
   Lead Thailand to
   Impose Loan Limits
   in Real Estate
3 November 10
   Thailand’s Cabinet
   approves Two
   Amendments to
   Constitution
3 November 10
   Thai Taxes Reduced
   for Flood Victims
1 November 10
   Domestic Violence Pilot
   Project Launched in
   Lampang and Surin
   Provinces
21 October 10
   Tax Deduction for
   Pensions Approved
   by Thai Cabinet
21 October 10
   Tax Incentives Approved
   to Attract New Regional
   Operating Headquarters
5 October 10
   Thai Ruling Stalls
   Viktor Bout Extradition

Thailand Lawyer Blog:
 Gay and Lesbian Partner
  Visas in the US: Part and
  Parcel of the Immigration
  Debate?
 The Extradition of
  Viktor Bout: Political
  or Just Wasteful?
 Will Manny Pacquiao
  Save Boxing: Mixed
  Martial Arts versus Boxing
 Nothing Spells LOVE
  More than a Prenuptial
  Agreement: UK’s new
  Prenuptial Agreement
  Case Decision
 Thai Chickens v. UK
  Chickens and Animal
  Rights in Thailand?
 Minnesota Lawyer
  Moonlights as Pimp:
  Prostitution as a New
  Lawyer Specialty?
 The Murder of a
  Transgender Lawyer in
  the UK and Transgender
  Rights in Thailand
 Currency Wars: How
  Does This Affect Thailand?
 Child Porn and Child
  Beggars on Sukhumvit
 Gay Suicides in the
  United States: Why
  not in Thailand?
 Texas Supreme Court
  Proposed Rule Prohibits
  Client Lawyer Sex
 Canada Prostitution
  Laws: What does
  this mean for Thailand?
 Separation of Powers in
  the USA and Thailand:
  General McChrystal
 Slash Live in Bangkok,
  Thailand
 Caning for Graffiti: Art
  and Authoritarianism in
  Singapore

 

Supreme Court Miscellaneous Slip Opinion 2550

 
Note concerning Thailand Supreme court opinions: Thailand is a civil law jurisdiction that also has elements of the common law system. Accordingly, the principle law sources are acts, statutes and regulations. However, published Supreme court decisions are an important part of the legal development of Thailand and are frequently used as a secondary authority. (Summaries sponsored by Chaninat & Leeds)
 

 

Thailand Supreme Court Opinion (No. 677) 2007
Mrs. Payoun Keawketthong et al. vs. Mr. Kamol Tanangsanakul by acting representatives Mr. Koukert Tanangsanakul et al.

Re: Adverse Possession of Land

Adverse possession of the Thailand real estate of another person, permitted according to section 1382 of the Civil and Commercial Code, is subject to possession of land with a title deed only and based on the condition that the trespasser must have resided on the land for a continuous period of 10 years or more.

Government authorities issued a title deed for the land of the five plaintiffs for the first time on 8 May 1996. The defendants (who had resided on the land for a period of time) filed a counterclaim on 6 Nov 1997, but were not entitled to ownership of the land, as they had possessed the land for a period of less than 10 years (from the issuing of the plaintiff's title deed).

The defendants cannot be granted ownership of land by calculating the period of land possession from the period prior to the issuing of the title deed, as the adverse possession of another person's land, according to law, is subject to land with a title deed.

 

 

2550 Thailand Supreme Court Opinion (No. 257) 2007
Mrs.Thidatip Srirun vs. Mr. Lerts Srirun

Re: Divorce

The plaintiff and the defendant live in the same home, yet not in a husband-wife relationship, not because they cannot live together as husband and wife, but because the plaintiff understood that the defendant (the plaintiff's husband) and the plaintiff's mother defrauded the plaintiff by procuring her house and farmland through deception. The plaintiff and the defendant live in the same house although their way of life is kept separate from each other. This mentality is acceptable to both parties. Therefore, the fact that the defendant took the eldest child to Bangkok to sell clothes is not considered a ground for divorce based on abandonment on the part of the defendant or an action offensive to the husband-wife relationship under section 1516(4)(6) of the Civil and Commercial Code.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     

Chaninat & Leeds offered support in translating Supreme Court case law. Chaninat & Leeds is a Thailand Law Firm practicing family and business law. Chaninat & Leeds specializes in Thailand criminal defense lawyer. Chaninat & Leeds is managed by an American attorney who specializes in immigration with a focus on family visas including prenuptial agreement Thailand. For any submissions, comments, or questions, e-mail the Thailand Law Forum at: info@thailawforum.com Please read our Disclaimer.

 

© Copyright Thailand Law Forum, All Rights Reserved
(except where the work is the individual works of the authors as noted)