|
de Streel, Alexandre., “New EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications”, DG Information Society - Seminario di studio sulla regolamentazione, Capri, 15 Ottobre 2002.
Europe’s Information Society, “Electronic Communications New Regulatory Framework – Principles”, eCommunications Regulation - IS Policy Fact Sheet, <http://europa.eu.int/information_society/doc/ factsheets/013-regulatory_framework.pdf>, (September 2005).
Europe’s Information Society, “Article 7 procedures – consolidating the EU single market for electronic communications”, eCommunications Regulation - IS Policy Fact Sheet, <http://europa.eu.int/information_society/doc/ factsheets/052-art7-en.pdf>, (January 2006)
Federal Communications Commission, “11th Annual Report and Analysis of Competitive Market Conditions With Respect to Commercial Mobile Services”, WT Docket No. 06-17, Released: September 29, 2006.
Hawker,Norman. Network Access, Regulation and Antitrust. The Economics of Legal Relationships. 8, The essential facility doctrine – A brief overview. Diana L. Moss. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Liikanen, Erkki. “Mobile Communications and the EU’s New Regulatory Framework”. Remark at IFT World Mobile Communications Conference-London, <http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do ?reference=SPEECH/04/232&format=PDF&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en>, 10 May 2004.
Loetz, Sascha., and Andreas Neumann, “The Scope of Sector-specific Regulation in the European Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications”, German Law Journal, Vol. 04, No. 12.
Philip Areeda "Essential Facilities: an Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles" (1990) 58 Antitrust Law Journal 841.
Pomlaktong, Narong, Wipada Mawichak, “Report on Telecommunication Licensing”, Thailand Research Fund – Project on Telecommunications Reform of Thailand, (March 2003).
Randal Picker, "Entry, Access and Facilities-Based Competition" (April 2004). American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings. American Law & Economics Association 14th Annual Meeting. Working Paper 33, <http://law.bepress.com/alea/14th/art33>.
Rattananubal, Rawadee, Apirudee Somboontanon, “Thai Telecommunications”, Real Sector Department, Monetary Policy Group, UNPAN, <http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN005381.pdf>, 2001.
Reding, Viviane. “Why we need more consistency in the application of EU telecom rules”. Remark at Telecom Italia Reception, Brussels, 11 December 2006.
Reding, Viviane. “Reaping the full benefits of a more coherent European approach to spectrum management”. Remark at European Spectrum Management Conference-Brussels, <http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/reding/ docs/speeches/esmc_20060329.pdf>, 29 March 2006.
Rubin, Jonathan L., Norman Hawker, and D. Adam Candeub. Network Access, Regulation and Antitrust. The Economics of Legal Relationships. 8, Access Remedies after Trinko. Diana L. Moss. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Shelanski, Howard A. “From Sector-Specific Regulation to Antitrust Law for U.S. Telecommunication: The Prospects for Transition”. UC Berkeley School of Law, Public Law and Legal Theory: Research Paper No. 80 (2002).
Sriswasdi, Rachaneekorn, “A report on the Thai market for Wireless Telecommunications”, International Market Research - Wireless Telecommunications, <http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/site/imr-ri.nsf/en/gr113839e.html>
Tangkitvanich, Somkiat, Taratorn Ratananarumitsorn, “Report on Telecommunication Interconnection”, Thailand Research Fund – Project on Telecommunications Reform of Thailand, (March 2003).
Yodmuangcharoen, Siripol, “Liberalization on Trade and Investment and Thai Competition Policy”, <http://www.jftc.go.jp/eacpf/06/6_01_07.pdf> |