Thailand Law Forum Thailand Law Forum  
 
Feature Articles :

US Immigration and
  Thai Sex Workers



Legal Rights of
  Transgenders and their
  Partners in Thailand



Renewable Energy
  in Thailand



The Erawan Shrine   Curse and the Red Shirt   Demonstrations



Marriage and Divorce
  in Thailand



Foreign Corrupt
  Practices Act and the
  Thailand Film Festival
Foreign Mafia in
  Thailand
Sex Laws in Thailand:
  Part 1

Thailand News :
16 August 10
   Medical Malpractice Bill
   to go before House of
   Representatives for
   Debate
11 August 10
   Guilty Verdict in Khmer
   Rouge Genocide Trial
6 July 10
   Final Draft for 3G
   License Auction Approved
6 July 10
   FDA Pulls 155 Websites
18 June 10
   Juthamas Told of
   Corruption Charges
3 June 10
   Tax Breaks for Regional
   Headquarters Approved
12 May 10
   New Thailand Surrogacy
   Draft Law Passed
12 May 10
   Cabinet Approves Law
   Amendment to Begin
   SET Liberalization
7 May 10
   Renewable Energy
   Gets a Boost
7 May 10
   Community Land Title
   Deeds May Be Issued
4 May 10
   Thailand Responds to
   Inclusion on US IP
   Watch List

Thailand Lawyer Blog:
 Separation of Powers in
  the USA and Thailand:
  General McChrystal
 Slash Live in Bangkok,
  Thailand
 Caning for Graffiti: Art
  and Authoritarianism in
  Singapore
 Extradition and Interpol
  Warrants: Reigning
  in Thaksin
 BLOOD IN THE STREETS:
  THAI PUBLIC RIGHT
  TO ASSEMBLY?
 Thailand Mortgage Law:
   Recent Changes
 Tourist Visa Application
  Rejected for the Dalai
  Lama’s Sister: Thailand’s
  Too-Careful Relationship
  with China
 Follow Up: Where is
  Thailand’s Inheritance
  Tax?
 Regent Residences
   Soi 13 Update
 Thailand Law Forum
   Update: Burmese Migrant
   Workers
 Sex Laws in Thailand
   Part II
 Thailand Law Forum
   Update: Foreign
   Investigators and
   Sex Changes
 Thailand Child
  Adoption Act Translation
  Now Available
 Ivory Trade and
 
Elephant Protection
 
in Thailand
 Sex Laws in Thailand
 
and other Thailand Law
   Forum Updates
 Thai Land Code English
 
Translation Published

Treaty between the government of the United States of America and the government of the Kingdom of Thailand on mutual assistance
in criminal matters.

Signed at Bangkok, March 19, 1986.


LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
The White House, April 22, 1988
To the Senate of the United States:

With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, signed at Bangkok on March 19, 1986. I transmit also, for the information of the Senate, the report of the Department of State with respect to the Treaty.

The Treaty is one of a series of modern mutual legal assistance treaties being negotiated by the United States in order to counter more effectively criminal activities. The Treaty should be an effective tool to prosecute a wide variety of modern criminals including members of drug cartels, "white-collar criminals," and terrorists. The Treaty is self-executing and utilizes existing statutory authority.

The Treaty provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes: (1) taking testimony or statements of witnesses; (2) providing documents, records, and evidence; (3) serving documents; (4) executing requests for searches and seizures; (5) transferring persons in custody for testimonial purposes; (6) locating persons; (7) initiating proceedings upon request; and (8) assisting in forfeiture proceedings.

I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to the Treaty and give its advice and consent to ratification.

Ronald Reagan.

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL
Department of State, Washington, April 18, 1988.
The President,
White House.

The President: I have the honor to submit to you the Treaty between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, signed at Bangkok on March 19, 1986. I recommend that the Treaty be transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification.

The Treaty covers mutual legal assistance in criminal matters. In recent years, similar bilateral treaties have entered into force with Italy, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Turkey; others have been concluded (but not yet entered into force) with the Bahamas, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Mexico, Morocco, and the United Kingdom on behalf of the Cayman Islands. The Treaty contains many provisions similar to those in the other treaties as well as some innovations.

The Treaty will not require further implementing legislation and will utilize the existing authority of the Federal courts, particularly 28 U.S.C. 1782.

Article 1 provides for assistance in "investigations, prosecutions and other proceedings relating to criminal matters." The Treaty thereby provides for assistance at the investigative stage (such as grand jury proceedings), as well as after formal charges have been filed. Assistance under the Treaty will include: taking testimony or statements of persons; provision of documents, records and evidence; serving documents; executing requests for searches and seizures; transferring persons in custody for testimonial proposes; locating witnesses; and other forms of assistance. The article states that it is not intended to create rights in private parties either to secure assistance or to suppress or exclude evidence obtained under the Treaty. The article also defines military offenses and provides that the treaty does not apply to such offenses.

Article 2 specifies the limited bases under the Treaty in which assistance may be denied by the Requested State. These bases are when the request would prejudice the sovereignty, security, or other essential public interests of the Requested State may postpone execution of a request if its execution would interfere with an ongoing investigation or prosecution. This article also provides that, before the Central Authority of the Requested State refuses a request, it should try to determine whether there is a way to render the assistance, subject to specified terms and conditions. If the Requesting State accepts the assistance subject to limitations, it must comply with those limitations.

Part 2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     

Chaninat & Leeds offered support in translating Supreme Court case law. Chaninat & Leeds is a Thailand Law Firm practicing family and business law. Chaninat & Leeds specializes in Thailand criminal Lawyer. Chaninat & Leeds is managed by an American attorney Thailand. For any submissions, comments, or questions, e-mail the Thailand Law Forum at: info@thailawforum.com Please read our Disclaimer.

 

© Copyright Thailand Law Forum, All Rights Reserved
(except where the work is the individual works of the authors as noted)