Quick Links: Thailand Law Seminars and Conference | Thai Law Forum Past Issues | About Thailand Law Forum | Advertising Guidelines | Publishing Guidelines

Feature Articles :

Fringe Medical
  Practices in Thailand



Analysis: Thailand’s
  Condominium Bubble



Neither Free nor Fair -
  Burma’s Sham Elections



US Immigration and
  Thai Sex Workers



Legal Rights of
  Transgenders and their
  Partners in Thailand



Renewable Energy
  in Thailand



The Erawan Shrine   Curse and the Red Shirt   Demonstrations



Marriage and Divorce
  in Thailand



Foreign Corrupt
  Practices Act and the
  Thailand Film Festival
Foreign Mafia in
  Thailand
Sex Laws in Thailand:
  Part 1

Thailand News :
4 February 11
   Thai Cabinet to
   Consider Customs Law
   Amendments
4 February 11
   Ministry Vows IPR
   Crackdown
3 February 11
   Thailand to Discuss
   Changes to FTA with
   Australia
29 January 11
   Thai Cabinet to Review
   Thai Nationality Bill
   on Tuesday
26 January 11
   End in Sight for
   Completion of PPP
   Draft Bill
26 January 11
   Charter Bill Passed
   by Thai Parliament
21 January 11
   Enforcement of
   International Corruption
   Laws Strengthens in Asia
18 January 11
   Burma’s Proposed
   Change in Labor Laws
   Welcomed by ILO
15 January 11
   More Charges Levied
   in Case of Thai Farm
   Worker Exploitation in
   the US
6 January 11
   Load of African
   Elephant Tusks
   Confiscated at Thai
   Airport

Thailand Lawyer Blog:
 Thailand Law Forum:
  Latest Updates–Including
  “Buying Gold in Thailand”
  Documentary
 The New Look of
  Thailand Law Forum
 US Refugee Visas: A
  Golden Ticket Finally
  Granted to a Juarez
  Journalist
 US Man Indicted for
  Impersonating a Lawyer:
  A Warning to Fake
  Lawyers in Thailand
 A Visit to the Border:
  Juarez El Paso and
  Murder City
 Will Thaksin Travel to
  the USA to Give
  Testimony: US Visa
  Problems and Extradition
 “Fringe” medical options
  while in Thailand: Still
  Considered “Fringe”?
 Yaba
  (methamphetamine):
  The Thai Worker’s
  Coca Leaf?
 Two International
  Divorce Cases Highlight
  International Prenuptial
  Agreements
 Gay and Lesbian Partner
  Visas in the US: Part and
  Parcel of the Immigration
  Debate?
 The Extradition of
  Viktor Bout: Political
  or Just Wasteful?
 Will Manny Pacquiao
  Save Boxing: Mixed
  Martial Arts versus Boxing
 Nothing Spells LOVE
  More than a Prenuptial
  Agreement: UK’s new
  Prenuptial Agreement
  Case Decision
 Thai Chickens v. UK
  Chickens and Animal
  Rights in Thailand?
 Minnesota Lawyer
  Moonlights as Pimp:
  Prostitution as a New
  Lawyer Specialty?
 

19 May 2009

TREATY ON EXTRADITION
BETWEEN
THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND
AND
THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA

The Kingdom of Thailand and the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “the Contracting Parties”),

Desiring to make more effective the countries in the prevention and suppression of crime the reciprocal extradition of offenders,

Have agreed as follows:

Article 1
Obligation to Extradite

Each Contracting Party agrees to extradite to •the other, in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty, any persons who are wanted for prosecution, trial or for the imposition or execution of punishment in the territory of the Requesting Party for an extraditable offence.

Article 2
Extraditable Offences

1. For the purposes of this Treaty, extraditable offences are offences, however described, which are punishable under the laws of both Contracting Parties including the laws relating to taxation, customs duties, foreign exchange control or other revenue matter, by imprisonment or other deprivation of liberty for a maximum period of at least one year or by a more severe penalty.

2. Where the request for extradition relates to a person sentenced to deprivation of liberty by a court of the Requesting Party for any extraditable offence, extradition shall be granted only if a period of at least six (6) months in the sentence remains to be served.

3. For the purposes of this Article, in determining whether an offence is an offence against the laws of both Contracting Parties:

(a) it shall not matter whether the laws of the Contracting Parties place the conduct constituting the offence within the same category of offence or denominate the offence by the same terminology;
(b) the totality of the conduct alleged against the person whose extradition is sought shall be taken into account and it shall not matter whether, under the laws of the Contracting Parties, the constituent elements of the offence differ.

4. Where the offence has been committed outside the territory of the Requesting Party, extradition shall be granted where the law of the Requested Party provides for the punishment of an offence committed outside its territory in similar circumstances. Where the law of the Requested Party does not so provide, the Requested Party may, in its discretion, grant extradition.

5. Extradition may be granted pursuant to the provisions of this Treaty in respect of an offence provided that:

(a) it was an offence in the Requesting Party at the time of the conduct constituting the offence; and
(b) the conduct alleged would, if it had taken place in the territory of the Requested Party at the time of the making of the request for extradition, have constituted an offence against the law in force in the territory of the Requested Party.

6. If the request for extradition relates to a number of offences, each of which is punishable under the laws of both Parties, but some of which do not meet the other requirements of paragraphs 1 and 2, the Requested Party may grant extradition for such offences, provided that the person is to be extradited for at least one extraditable offence.

Next Page  [1]  [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

 
© Copyright Thailand Law Forum, All Rights Reserved
(except where the work is the individual works of the authors as noted)