Quick Links: Thailand Law Seminars and Conference | Thai Law Forum Past Issues | About Thailand Law Forum | Advertising Guidelines | Publishing Guidelines

Feature Articles :

Fringe Medical
  Practices in Thailand



Analysis: Thailand’s
  Condominium Bubble



Neither Free nor Fair -
  Burma’s Sham Elections



US Immigration and
  Thai Sex Workers



Legal Rights of
  Transgenders and their
  Partners in Thailand



Renewable Energy
  in Thailand



The Erawan Shrine   Curse and the Red Shirt   Demonstrations



Marriage and Divorce
  in Thailand



Foreign Corrupt
  Practices Act and the
  Thailand Film Festival
Foreign Mafia in
  Thailand
Sex Laws in Thailand:
  Part 1

Thailand News :
4 February 11
   Thai Cabinet to
   Consider Customs Law
   Amendments
4 February 11
   Ministry Vows IPR
   Crackdown
3 February 11
   Thailand to Discuss
   Changes to FTA with
   Australia
29 January 11
   Thai Cabinet to Review
   Thai Nationality Bill
   on Tuesday
26 January 11
   End in Sight for
   Completion of PPP
   Draft Bill
26 January 11
   Charter Bill Passed
   by Thai Parliament
21 January 11
   Enforcement of
   International Corruption
   Laws Strengthens in Asia
18 January 11
   Burma’s Proposed
   Change in Labor Laws
   Welcomed by ILO
15 January 11
   More Charges Levied
   in Case of Thai Farm
   Worker Exploitation in
   the US
6 January 11
   Load of African
   Elephant Tusks
   Confiscated at Thai
   Airport

Thailand Lawyer Blog:
 Thailand Law Forum:
  Latest Updates–Including
  “Buying Gold in Thailand”
  Documentary
 The New Look of
  Thailand Law Forum
 US Refugee Visas: A
  Golden Ticket Finally
  Granted to a Juarez
  Journalist
 US Man Indicted for
  Impersonating a Lawyer:
  A Warning to Fake
  Lawyers in Thailand
 A Visit to the Border:
  Juarez El Paso and
  Murder City
 Will Thaksin Travel to
  the USA to Give
  Testimony: US Visa
  Problems and Extradition
 “Fringe” medical options
  while in Thailand: Still
  Considered “Fringe”?
 Yaba
  (methamphetamine):
  The Thai Worker’s
  Coca Leaf?
 Two International
  Divorce Cases Highlight
  International Prenuptial
  Agreements
 Gay and Lesbian Partner
  Visas in the US: Part and
  Parcel of the Immigration
  Debate?
 The Extradition of
  Viktor Bout: Political
  or Just Wasteful?
 Will Manny Pacquiao
  Save Boxing: Mixed
  Martial Arts versus Boxing
 Nothing Spells LOVE
  More than a Prenuptial
  Agreement: UK’s new
  Prenuptial Agreement
  Case Decision
 Thai Chickens v. UK
  Chickens and Animal
  Rights in Thailand?
 Minnesota Lawyer
  Moonlights as Pimp:
  Prostitution as a New
  Lawyer Specialty?
 

19 May 2009

TREATY
BETWEEN
THE KINGKOM OF THAILAND
AND
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH
RELATING TO EXTRADITION

The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand and the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, hereinafter referred to as the Contracting States;

Desiring to provide for more effective cooperation between the two States in the suppression of crimes;

Desiring also to conclude a ‘treaty for the reciprocal extradition of offenders;

Have agreed as follows:

ARTICLE I
Obligation to Extradite

(1) The Contracting States agree to extradite to each other, subject to the provisions of this Treaty, persons found in the territory of one of the Contracting States who have been proceeded against for, have been charged with, have been found guilty of, or are wanted for the enforcement of a judicially pronounced penalty for committing an extraditable offence, by the judicial authority of the other Contracting State. The term judicial authority’’ shall include the police and public prosecution authority for the purpose of proceeding against or charging such persons in accordance with the laws of each Contracting State.
(2) With respect to an extraditable offence committed outside the territory of the Requesting State, the Requested State shall grant extradition, subject to the provisions of this Treaty, if its laws would provide for the punishment of such an offence in comparable circumstances.

ARTICLE 2
Extraditable Offences

(1) An offence shall be an extraditable offence for prosecution or for the imposition of a penalty or detention order only if it is punishable under the laws of both Contracting Parties by imprisonment or other form of detention for a period of more than one year or by any greater punishment.
For the enforcement of a penalty or detention order for such an extraditable offence, extradition shall he granted if the duration of the penalty or detention order still to be served amounts to at least six months.
(2) An offence shall be an extraditable offence if it consists of preparing or attempting to commit, aiding or abetting, assisting, counseling or procuring the commission of, or being an accessory before or after the fact of an offence described in paragraph (1) of this Article provided that such offences are punishable under the laws of both Contracting States by imprisonment or other form of detention for a period of more than one year or by any greater punishment.
(3) For the purposes of this Article, an offence shall be an extraditable offence, whether or not the laws of the Contracting States place the offence within the same category of offences or denominate the offence by the same terminology.
(4) When extradition has been granted with respect to an extraditable offence, it may also be granted in respect of any other offence specified in the extradition request that meets all other requirements for extradition except for periods of penalty or detention order set forth in paragraph. (1) of this Article.


Next Page  [1]  [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

 
© Copyright Thailand Law Forum, All Rights Reserved
(except where the work is the individual works of the authors as noted)